<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple iSlate Name Good or Bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://namestormers.com/company-names-blog/apple-islate-name-good-or-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://namestormers.com/company-names-blog/apple-islate-name-good-or-bad/</link>
	<description>Return to Namestormers.com &#62;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://namestormers.com/company-names-blog/apple-islate-name-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 10:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namestormers.com/company-names-blog/?p=243#comment-370</guid>
		<description>John, I am not sure what you are referring too when asking &quot;How it is possible?&quot; If you are referring to a name that can gain traction with a minimal budget, there are many examples: think STARBUCKS and not ACCENTURE.  STARBUCKS spent very little initially but still people found the name engaging / intriguing and wanted to find out more vs. ACCENTURE had to spend over $100 MM just to get people to remember the name and start to understand the whole &quot;accent on the future&quot; idea. Email me if you want to discuss further: mike@namestormers.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I am not sure what you are referring too when asking &#8220;How it is possible?&#8221; If you are referring to a name that can gain traction with a minimal budget, there are many examples: think STARBUCKS and not ACCENTURE.  STARBUCKS spent very little initially but still people found the name engaging / intriguing and wanted to find out more vs. ACCENTURE had to spend over $100 MM just to get people to remember the name and start to understand the whole &#8220;accent on the future&#8221; idea. Email me if you want to discuss further: <a href="mailto:mike@namestormers.com">mike@namestormers.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

